ReviewEcology and evolution2026
Biomonitoring 3.0: Beyond Taxa Lists to Evidence-Tiered Monitoring of Ecosystem Dynamics and Interactions.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing has transformed biomonitoring by enabling scalable molecular inventories, but most programs still emphasize taxa lists. In this Perspective, Biomonitoring 3.0 is proposed as a framework that builds on molecular inventories to monitor ecological dynamics, interactions, and biological responses through time. Environmental RNA is presented as a complementary source of information because, in some settings, it can provide more temporally local evidence of recent biological activity and responses than DNA alone. An inference ladder is introduced to grade interaction evidence from co-detection and statistical associations to interaction-explicit links, coupled signal-response dynamics and, where feasible, ecosystem-level consequences. Field designs are outlined that use repeated time-series sampling and paired sampling of potential signal sources and recipients to improve temporal interpretation and strengthen attribution. Minimum reporting elements are also recommended to support transparent comparison, validation, and cross-study synthesis. The "3.0" designation therefore refers to a change in the primary monitoring objective: from documenting community membership alone to evaluating ecological dynamics and feedbacks relevant to ecosystem condition and management. We conclude with a practical agenda for developing environmental nucleic-acid measurements into decision-relevant indicators of interactions and change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.