Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42706923›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Estimating seasonal survival of migratory birds using continuous-time capture-recapture models.

Michael Schaub, Raphaël Arlettaz, Irmi Zwahlen, Ellen C Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Estimating seasonal survival of migratory birds using continuous-time capture-recapture models.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael SchaubSchweizerische Vogelwarte, Sempach, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2745-0557
Raphaël ArlettazConservation Biology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6360-5339
Irmi ZwahlenSchweizerische Vogelwarte, Sempach, Switzerland.
Ellen C MartinSchweizerische Vogelwarte, Sempach, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3088-3388

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 138354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the population dynamics of migratory species requires consideration of their entire annual cycle. A key requirement is the decomposition of annual survival into seasonal periods. While there is increasing evidence that migrations are the most dangerous phase of the annual cycle, temporal variation in seasonal survival and its effect on population dynamics is still poorly understood. Estimating seasonal survival is challenging when individuals are only encountered during a restricted period of their annual cycle. We developed and tested a continuous-time capture-recapture model applicable to data from marked individuals that can only be encountered during the breeding season. This model allows annual survival to be separated into breeding and non-breeding periods. We applied this model to encounter data of hoopoes (Upupa epops) collected between 2002 and 2024 from a Swiss population during the breeding period to estimate survival during the breeding and the non-breeding periods and their respective annual variations. We then linked seasonal survival with environmental variables from the breeding, stopover, and wintering grounds, which have been documented by previous research on the same population. Mortality hazards were 17 times greater during the non-breeding than during the breeding period, with stronger annual variation observed in the former. Mortality increased during both seasonal periods when a surrogate of prey abundance at the wintering grounds was lower. The effect during the non-breeding period highlighted that environmental conditions outside the breeding season were an important driver of hoopoe population dynamics, whereas the effect during the breeding period was weaker and provided evidence of a carry-over effect. In contrast, the environmental variables considered on the breeding and stopover grounds had little impact on seasonal survival. The study adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that migration and wintering are critical phases in the life cycle of migratory birds and that population dynamics are strongly affected by environmental conditions encountered during wintering. The methodological approach developed is applicable to datasets that record multiple encounters of individuals during the breeding season. It enables the analysis of existing data to study temporal variation in survival across periods of the annual cycle.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationBirdsModels, BiologicalSeasonsAnimalsPopulation DynamicsSwitzerlandcarry‐over effectfull annual cyclemigrationmortality hazard rateseasonal survivalUpupa epops

Identifiers

PMID42706923
PMCPMC13551070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.