Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42706909›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2026

The Heart of the Matter: Staff Insights Into Organ Donation Conversations.

Lydia Shim, Cynthia J Wensley, Rachael L Parke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lydia ShimDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-3503
Cynthia J WensleySchool of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-7514
Rachael L ParkeSchool of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4209-0334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrgan donation in intensive care units (ICU) involves complex, emotional conversations with families during end-of-life care. While literature often examines consent rates, clinical protocols and family experiences, less is known about the factors that shape donation discussions from the perspective of ICU staff.

aimsTo understand ICU staff experiences and perspectives of factors influencing organ donation discussions and family decision-making in New Zealand ICUs. STUDY

designA qualitative descriptive study using reflexive thematic analysis of focus group data from 11 ICU staff (medical, nursing and health psychology) across three tertiary ICU facilities.

findingsThree key themes were developed: Having a 'Good' Conversation, Acknowledging the Emotional and Mental Weight and Having the Will to Endure and Feeling Equipped to Care. Participants emphasised the importance of trust-based communication with families; culturally and emotionally responsive care tailored to families' individual needs; and regulating the emotional demands of donation work. Staff relied on regular collegial support to maintain emotional resilience and valued structured education, team preparation and access to resources that built their confidence in donation conversations. Participants identified practices and values that fostered a positive unit culture around organ donation, contributing to team resilience and meaningful family interactions.

conclusionsThis study offers insight into the interpersonal, emotional and practical aspects of organ donation work in NZ ICUs from the perspective of staff. Findings show that supportive team culture, underpinned by quality communication, team preparation, emotional safety and adequate resources, enables more meaningful donation conversations with families. These insights highlight opportunities for strengthening practice, education and unit culture in donation work. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Findings support the need for regular, multidisciplinary education; emotional support structures; and clear, standardised team processes to enhance donation conversations. Improving systemic infrastructure, such as robust donor identification pathways and public-facing education, can further prepare staff and families to navigate donation as a normalised aspect of end-of-life care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationFamilyIntensive Care UnitsProfessional-Family RelationsTissue and Organ ProcurementDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleNew ZealandQualitative Researchdonation conversationsfocus groupshealthcare professionalsintensive care unitsorgan donation

Identifiers

PMID42706909
PMCPMC13551057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.