ReviewCancer science2026
Spatiotemporal CD8
Review in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has shifted the paradigm of cancer treatment, yet the fundamental mechanisms governing the long-term sustainability of antitumor T-cell responses remain elusive. Emerging evidence suggests that the efficacy of ICI depends not only on the reinvigoration of pre-existing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes but also on the continuous mobilization and replacement of T-cell clones from systemic reservoirs. In this review, we propose a "spatiotemporal ecosystem model" of the antitumor T-cell response. We first delineate the spatial dynamics of T-cell clones, where tumor-reactive progenitors primed in the tumor-draining lymph nodes (dLN) circulate through the peripheral blood to replenish the tumor microenvironment (TME). We highlight that TCR avidity emerges as a key determinant of clonal fate; while high-avidity clones provide potent early cytotoxicity, their susceptibility to accelerated terminal exhaustion eventually creates an available niche that allows for the subsequent expansion of intermediate-avidity successor clones. Furthermore, we discuss how single-cell multi-omics integration (transcriptome, TCR repertoire, and epigenome) reveals that clonal fate is functionally encoded in the molecular and metabolic poise of T cells prior to their expansion. Finally, we discuss the potential of monitoring these clonal dynamics through liquid biopsy as a non-invasive window into the resilience of the immune ecosystem, distinguishing responders with sustainable, polyclonal mobilization from non-responders with frustrated, oligoclonal responses. By integrating clonal evolution, metabolic fitness, and inter-organ crosstalk, this ecosystem perspective offers a comprehensive framework for predicting therapeutic outcomes and developing next-generation precision immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.