ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
Modelling compressive loading in large-bodied mammals reveals distinct biomechanical strategies in proboscidean humeri.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proboscideans exhibit limb morphologies specialised for supporting extreme body masses under predominantly compressive loading. These graviportal adaptations include repositioning of the limb bones closer to the trunk, resulting in a columnar stance. Among proboscideans, two humeral morphotypes have been proposed (slender and robust), yet their functional significance under compressive loading remains poorly understood. Finite element analysis (FEA) is applied to evaluate biomechanical performances of proboscidean humeri subject to axial compression, simulating conditions associated with a columnar stance and deviations from it. Our results reveal clear differences between morphotypes, with slender humeri performing worse than the robust morphotype and functioning optimally under near-axial loading. Robust humeri consistently exhibit lower peak stress under both neutral and off-axis loading and show considerable resistance to mediolateral stresses. Across all taxa, stress magnitudes generally increase when deviating from a neutral orientation, especially during posterior loading orientations, highlighting the mechanical importance of maintaining columnar limb posture. These findings support the hypothesis that robust morphologies are better adapted to resist multidirectional stresses, while slender morphologies favour energetic and locomotor efficiency. This study demonstrates the applicability of FEA in assessing compressive performance in postcranial elements and provides a novel framework for investigating biomechanical adaptations in graviportal taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.