ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2026
Spinal manipulation in acute low back pain patients is associated with reduced motor-unit firing variability without altering bilateral coordination: a single-motor-unit EMG study of the lumbar multifidus.
Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe neurophysiology of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM) is poorly understood. We have characterized motor unit (MU) discharge in acute low back pain (ALBP) patients after spinal manipulation and compared with pre-manipulation findings in the same subjects.
methodsFine-wire electrodes were implanted bilaterally into the deep lumbar multifidus muscle at the painful spinal level in 9 ALBP patients with pain of less than three weeks duration in March-April 2007. HVLA-SM was applied to the painful spinal level. EMG activity was recorded during manipulation and during spontaneous and voluntary force production while standing and sitting, and individual MUs were identified and their discharge characteristics described. All subjects were compared to their own data recorded before HVLA-SM for effects on gross EMG activity duration, MU discharge rate, interspike interval variability quantified as inter-quartile range for differences between consecutive inter-spike intervals (∆ISI IQR), and common drive coefficient between concurrently active MUs.
resultsNo effects on MU discharge rate were evident in the first seconds after HVLA-SM. ∆ISI IQR was reduced by 5.25 ms (95% confidence interval 0.68-9.82; P = 0.025) after spinal manipulation compared with pre-manipulation findings, while median MU discharge rate and total duration of gross activity remained unchanged. Notably, the common drive coefficient was lower for bilateral than unilateral MU pairs (- 0.149; 95% confidence interval - 0.087 to - 0.210; P < 0.0001). This is in agreement with findings in the same ALBP population before HVLA-SM and in contrast to previous findings during spontaneous standing in pain free subjects, where common drive to uni- and bilateral pairs was not significantly different. MUs showed signs of self-sustained firing, but rotation between units was not observed.
conclusionsWe have established a methodological framework for future investigations using spontaneous muscle activity rather than forced movements to understand the influence of spinal manipulation on the role of the nervous system in postural support. HVLA-SM was associated with reduced MU firing variability, suggesting a shift toward more stable motoneuron output in the deep lumbar multifidus. Longitudinal recovery data are needed to discriminate whether the reduced common drive to bilateral muscle pairs represents a pre-existing trait or a pain-driven state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.