Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42706554›Full record

ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2026

Comparison of microdrop administration using a bottle adapter of 2.5% phenylephrine and 0.8% tropicamide with standard drop for ROP examination: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.

Vivetha Elango, Narayanan E, Muthukumaran N

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vivetha ElangoDepartment of Neonatology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. vivethu@yahoo.co.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9850-1147
Narayanan EDepartment of Neonatology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Muthukumaran NDepartment of Neonatology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacologic mydriasis is essential for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening; however, conventional ophthalmic drops substantially exceed neonatal conjunctival sac volume, leading to systemic absorption and potential adverse effects. Microdrop administration may reduce drug exposure while preserving adequate pupillary dilation. This study aimed to determine whether microdrop administration of phenylephrine and tropicamide is noninferior to standard drops in achieving adequate mydriasis for ROP screening via a bottle adapter.

methodsThis single-center, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority trial was conducted in a tertiary neonatal unit in Chennai, India. Preterm infants undergoing routine ROP screening were randomized to receive either microdrops (10.26 µL) or standard drops (26.58 µL) of 2.5% phenylephrine and 0.8% tropicamide. Three doses were administered at 10-minute intervals. The primary outcome was the mean pupil diameter at 45 min after the first instillation. The secondary outcomes included physiological parameters (heart rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure), systemic and local adverse events, and the adequacy of ROP examination. A noninferiority margin of - 0.5 mm was prespecified.

resultsAmong the 127 infants assessed for eligibility, 102 were randomized (microdrop group, n = 52; standard group, n = 50), and all completed the study. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. At 45 min, mean pupil diameter was 6.54 ± 0.52 mm in the microdrop group and 6.38 ± 0.63 mm in the standard-drop group (mean difference, 0.16 mm; 95% CI, - 0.07 to 0.38 mm; p for noninferiority < 0.001). As the lower bound of the 95% CI (- 0.07 mm) was above the prespecified noninferiority margin of - 0.5 mm, noninferiority was established. Physiological parameters, including heart rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure, remained stable and comparable between the groups. Systemic adverse events were rare and similar across groups, and no local ocular complications were observed. ROP examination was successfully completed in all infants.

conclusionMicrodrop administration of phenylephrine and tropicamide achieved mydriasis comparable to standard drops, with no significant difference in adverse effects between the groups. This approach may represent a safer, clinically feasible and more physiologically appropriate strategy for ROP screening by reducing drug exposure in vulnerable preterm infants.

trial registrationThe study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Madras Medical College, Chennai (IEC No. MMC/Approval/12052025). The trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/REF/2025/03/101681)on 10-03-2025.

Indexed as

Bottle adapterMicrodropMydriasisNanodropperPhenylephrinePremature neonateRetinopathy of prematurityROPTropicamide

Identifiers

PMID42706554
PMCPMC13551838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.