ReviewNeurological research and practice2026
Delivering high-quality multiple sclerosis care in Germany: challenges and regional models.
Review in Neurological research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) care in Germany has entered a phase in which therapeutic progress is increasingly constrained by delivery capacity. Earlier diagnosis, broader access to high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), and more refined monitoring strategies have improved the potential for favourable long-term outcomes. At the same time, these advances have increased the need for specialised expertise, infusion and monitoring infrastructure, rapid imaging access, structured safety procedures, and cross-sector coordination. Real-world evidence from Germany indicates a shift towards early high-efficacy treatment but also shows regional variation in treatment initiation, therapy intensity, and the proportion of people with MS who remain DMT-untreated. This expert-informed narrative review combines a non-systematic literature review with selected regional implementation examples from German MS care. This review synthesises key delivery challenges in German MS care and maps regional models whose underlying organisational principles may be transferable across healthcare settings, while their specific implementation depends on the local regulatory and reimbursement context. The central argument is that high-quality MS care should be understood not only as a therapeutic decision but as a system property: evidence-based treatment must be embedded in reliable pathways for diagnosis, monitoring, escalation, de-escalation, rehabilitation, and long-term support. Regional models such as ambulatory specialist care structures, hub-and-spoke networks, Germany´s inpatient MS complex treatment programme, delegated task models, telemedical consultation pathways, and digital monitoring infrastructures provide practical building blocks. Implementation at scale will require measurable quality indicators, financing of coordination work, formalised skill-mix models, digital interoperability, and explicit strategies for ageing and multimorbid MS populations. For neurological practice, the challenge is therefore not whether modern MS care is possible, but how to make it reproducible, safe, and equitable across regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.