ArticleBMC public health2026
Effectiveness of an on-site vaccination campaign for patients with cancer.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with haematological or oncological malignancies are at increased risk of severe infections. Vaccination is a key preventive strategy and is recommended by National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs). Yet, vaccination rates in this population remain improvable. This project aimed to evaluate and enhance vaccine uptake in cancer patients.
methodsWe conducted a pre- and post-observational study at the University Hospital Cologne in Germany to assess vaccination status over a 1.5-year intervention. Relevant infections included COVID-19, influenza, herpes zoster, pneumococci and RSV. The campaign included patient education, staff training, on-site vaccination, and targeted promotional efforts.
resultsA total of 749 patients were included (n = 398 in 2023, n = 351 in 2025). Overall vaccination rates increased from 43 to 49%, while COVID-19 vaccine coverage remained above 90%. Notable increases were observed for influenza (37% to 48%), pneumococcal (16% to 36%), and herpes zoster (22% to 33%) vaccines. The proportion of patients fully vaccinated according to public health recommendations rose from 6 to 16%, whereas those completely unvaccinated remained low (4% to 6%).
conclusionFocused vaccination campaigns can effectively increase vaccine uptake in patients with cancer; however, the proportion of individuals vaccinated per recommended schedule remains low. Future research should investigate barriers and reasons for vaccine refusal to guide more targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.