ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Comparison of serum C3, C3a, C4 levels between cataract patients with and without pseudoexfoliation and normal individuals.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to compare serum complement C3, C3a, and C4 levels between cataract patients with and without pseudoexfoliation syndrome, and to compare these groups with the control group.
methodsThere were three different groups in the study. The total of 150 patients, 50 in each group, were included. Group 1 consisted of cataract patients with pseudoexfoliation, Group 2 consisted of cataract patients without pseudoexfoliation, and Group 3 consisted of healthy individuals. After centrifugation of the blood samples, the serum portion was stored at - 80 °C until the analysis. Complement C3, C3a, and C4 levels were evaluated in these three groups using commercially available sandwich ELISA kits.
resultsThere was a statistically significant difference just between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding C4 values. However, after the age correction, this significance was disappeared.
conclusionsNo statistically significant difference in serum complement C3, C3a, and C4 levels was found between cataract patients with and without pseudoexfoliation syndrome after correcting for age. As only serum was evaluated, this finding does not exclude local complement pathway activation within the eye, and should not be read as evidence against a role for complement in pseudoexfoliation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.