ArticleBMC genomics2026
A hybrid and cost-efficient barcoding strategy for full-length 16S rRNA gene nanopore sequencing of environmental samples.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate species-level identification of bacteria in complex environmental samples is essential for applications in biotechnology, ecological monitoring, and clinical diagnostics. Short-read platforms such as Illumina frequently truncate the 16S rRNA gene, limiting taxonomic resolution. In this work, we applied Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) long-read sequencing to full-length 16S rRNA amplicon in samples from natural soil amended with lignocellulosic biomass and a simplified microbial community derived from cultures grown on selective and differential carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)-based substrates, with the aim to evaluate the difference in performance between a real, complex community and a less complex system. To reduce consumable costs, we substituted the standard ONT Barcoding kits with an in-house hybrid barcoding workflow. Specifically, PacBio PCR-based barcoding protocol was used for sample indexing, followed by library preparation using the ONT Ligation Sequencing Kit. This simplified approach retained compatibility with MinION and Flongle flow cells and supported accurate downstream demultiplexing while lowering barcode costs substantially. Additionally, a new bioinformatic workflow tailored to ONT data was implemented.
resultsOverall, the hybrid protocol significantly reduced per-sample barcoding costs while preserving high sequencing quality and throughput. The sequencing run yielded over 5 Gb of quality-filtered data (Q-score ≥ 10). Furthermore, the new bioinformatic workflow allowed taxonomic assignment at the species level for 49.38% of annotated taxa, compared to just 4.59% using Illumina NovaSeq sequencing of the V3-V4 region. ONT also recovered 2.3 times more genera and 1.3 times more families. Although 16S rRNA gene sequencing often cannot distinguish between closely related species, particularly within taxonomically complex groups, in this work, full-length reads substantially improved both taxonomic resolution and database matching.
conclusionsThese results show that full-length 16S rRNA sequencing with ONT, paired with a low-cost barcoding strategy, enhanced taxonomic resolution compared to short-read workflows. This approach also offers a scalable and cost-effective option for high-resolution microbiome profiling in research and applied settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.