ReviewOral radiology2026
A narrative review of artificial intelligence in dental imaging: from dataset design to clinical translation.
Review in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo review the development pipeline of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental imaging, focusing on dataset design, annotation quality, model development, validation, and clinical translation. DATA: Published literature on AI applications in dental imaging, including machine learning, deep learning, and foundation-model-based approaches. SOURCES: Peer-reviewed studies addressing imaging modalities, dataset construction, annotation protocols, model architectures, performance evaluation, and clinical translation. STUDY SELECTION: Studies involving panoramic radiography, intraoral radiography, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and intraoral scanning were reviewed, with emphasis on dataset quality, annotation methodology, model evaluation, interpretability, and clinical implementation.
conclusionsAI has demonstrated considerable potential for automated classification, detection, segmentation, and decision support in dental imaging. However, challenges including dataset heterogeneity, annotation inconsistency, domain shift, information leakage, interpretability, and regulatory requirements continue to limit clinical adoption. Emerging approaches such as multimodal learning and foundation models may improve generalizability and clinical applicability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This review highlights key methodological and translational considerations beyond algorithm performance, providing guidance for developing reliable and clinically meaningful AI systems in dental imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42706458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.