ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Effect of native Posterior condylar axis-Transepicondylar axis variability on femoral component rotation using robotic total knee arthroplasty.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is critical for flexion balance, patellofemoral tracking, and implant longevity. Conventional techniques apply a fixed 3° external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis (PCA), assuming a constant relationship with the transepicondylar axis (TEA). However, anatomical variability challenges this assumption. This study evaluated whether robotic-assisted TKA individualizes femoral rotation according to native PCA-TEA anatomy rather than applying a fixed rotational target. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 52 patients (72 knees) undergoing primary CT-based robot (MAKO) assisted TKA for primary osteoarthritis of the knee. Preoperative CT scans were used to determine the native PCA-TEA angle. Intraoperative femoral component rotation relative to PCA and TEA was recorded using robot-generated measurements. Correlations were assessed using Spearman's coefficient, with subgroup analysis across PCA-TEA strata.
resultsThe median PCA-TEA angle was 2.3° (range -1.9 to 8.7°). Median femoral rotation was 3.9° (range -1.2 to 9.6°) relative to PCA and 1.1° (range -3.4 to 4.9°) relative to TEA. A strong positive correlation existed between PCA-TEA angle and rotation relative to PCA (ρ = 0.8, p < 0.001), while a moderate negative correlation was observed relative to TEA (ρ = -0.5, p < 0.001). Knees with negative PCA-TEA anatomy demonstrated significantly lower rotation than the conventional 3° target (p < 0.05).
conclusionRobotic functional alignment adapts femoral component rotation to native PCA-TEA anatomy within predefined rotational boundaries rather than adhering to a fixed 3° paradigm. While this demonstrates patient-specific rotational adaptation, whether such adaptation provides a clinical benefit remains to be demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42706454What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.