Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42706454›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026

Effect of native Posterior condylar axis-Transepicondylar axis variability on femoral component rotation using robotic total knee arthroplasty.

Prashant Tank, Nitin Chauhan, Harsh Jain, Tejaswin Jha, Vivek Shankar, Vijay Kumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prashant TankAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. prashanttank12@gmail.com.
Nitin ChauhanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-8094
Harsh JainAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8921-2099
Tejaswin JhaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vivek ShankarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vijay KumarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is critical for flexion balance, patellofemoral tracking, and implant longevity. Conventional techniques apply a fixed 3° external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis (PCA), assuming a constant relationship with the transepicondylar axis (TEA). However, anatomical variability challenges this assumption. This study evaluated whether robotic-assisted TKA individualizes femoral rotation according to native PCA-TEA anatomy rather than applying a fixed rotational target. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 52 patients (72 knees) undergoing primary CT-based robot (MAKO) assisted TKA for primary osteoarthritis of the knee. Preoperative CT scans were used to determine the native PCA-TEA angle. Intraoperative femoral component rotation relative to PCA and TEA was recorded using robot-generated measurements. Correlations were assessed using Spearman's coefficient, with subgroup analysis across PCA-TEA strata.

resultsThe median PCA-TEA angle was 2.3° (range -1.9 to 8.7°). Median femoral rotation was 3.9° (range -1.2 to 9.6°) relative to PCA and 1.1° (range -3.4 to 4.9°) relative to TEA. A strong positive correlation existed between PCA-TEA angle and rotation relative to PCA (ρ = 0.8, p < 0.001), while a moderate negative correlation was observed relative to TEA (ρ = -0.5, p < 0.001). Knees with negative PCA-TEA anatomy demonstrated significantly lower rotation than the conventional 3° target (p < 0.05).

conclusionRobotic functional alignment adapts femoral component rotation to native PCA-TEA anatomy within predefined rotational boundaries rather than adhering to a fixed 3° paradigm. While this demonstrates patient-specific rotational adaptation, whether such adaptation provides a clinical benefit remains to be demonstrated.

Indexed as

Femoral component rotationPosterior condylar axis (PCA)Robotic assisted TKATransepicondylar axis (TEA)

Identifiers

PMID42706454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.