Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42706407›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2026

Programmable enzymes for targeted gene insertion.

George D Lampe, Rebeca T King, Samuel H Sternberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

George D LampeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-2372
Rebeca T KingDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-4539
Samuel H SternbergDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. shsternberg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-9114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing technologies have advanced from nuclease-based reagents that generate programmed DNA double-strand breaks, which can cause deleterious effects, to next-generation reagents that perform controlled DNA modification through double-strand break-independent mechanisms, such as base editing and prime editing. Although these approaches enable precise small-scale sequence changes, methods for programmable insertion of large DNA cargos have been limited. The ability to write entire genes or large regions into the genome could transform the treatment of genetically heterogeneous disorders, for which numerous pathogenic variants underlie a common disease and mutation-specific editing strategies are impractical. Recent advances in computational genome mining have accelerated the discovery of naturally occurring enzymes with novel biochemical and functional properties, including recombinases and transposases capable of large-scale modifications. Moreover, directed evolution, rational engineering and expanded homologue discovery are enabling the repurposing and optimization of these systems for genome engineering. Here we review recent technology development efforts that harness diverse enzymes for kilobase-scale genome engineering, with a particular focus on CRISPR-associated transposase systems.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.