Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42706406›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026

The impact of body refrigeration on decomposition and postmortem interval estimation.

Victor Chungwane, Lawrence Hill, Craig A Keyes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victor ChungwaneDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Private Bag 3, WITS 2050, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-8190
Lawrence HillDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Private Bag 3, WITS 2050, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-7054
Craig A KeyesDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Private Bag 3, WITS 2050, South Africa. craig.keyes@wits.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-470X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstimating the postmortem interval (PMI) is a critical component of forensic investigations. Refrigeration is routinely used to slow or halt decomposition prior to autopsy; however, its impact on PMI estimation using total body score (TBS) and entomological methods remains insufficiently understood.

methodsThis study used ten domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) carcasses (20-40 kg) decomposed under controlled conditions. Two controls were included: one remained unrefrigerated for 17 days and one refrigerated for 17 days. Eight experimental carcasses decomposed subaerially for 4, 7, 10, or 13 days before being refrigerated for four days, simulating standard forensic practice. Daily TBS, body and ambient temperatures, and accumulated degree days were recorded. PMI estimates were calculated at the end of both the subaerial and refrigeration periods using TBS and entomological approaches.

resultsPMI estimates were most accurate when calculated prior to refrigeration, with 100% accuracy for both TBS (using body temperature) and entomological methods (using ambient temperature). Accuracy decreased following refrigeration to 75% for both methods. In inaccurate cases, refrigeration consistently led to PMI overestimation.

conclusionThese findings indicate that refrigeration negatively affects the accuracy of PMI estimation using both TBS and entomological methods. Consequently, PMI should be estimated prior to refrigeration wherever possible to improve forensic accuracy.

Indexed as

Accumulated degree daysEntomologyMaggot massPostmortem intervalRefrigerationTotal body scores

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.