ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Psychosocial and supportive care in radiation therapy: a qualitative comparison of Norway and Canada.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRadiation therapy technologists (RTTs) are well positioned to address psychosocial and supportive care (PSSC) needs through daily patient contact. However, PSSC remains inconsistently integrated in practice. Building on prior cross-national survey findings, this study aimed to deepen understanding of how Norwegian and Canadian RTTs' perceptions and practices in providing PSSC, and identify barriers and opportunities to improve PSSC delivery.
methodsA qualitative comparative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with RTTs practicing in Norway and Canada. Participants were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. The interview guide explored four categories: 1) demographics; 2) perceptions and current practices related to PSSC; 3) barriers and enablers of PSSC; and 4) opportunities to improve PSSC delivery. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis to identify themes and compare patterns across both countries.
resultsA total of 26 RTTs were interviewed (Norway: n = 13; Canada: n = 13). RTTs in both countries recognized the importance of providing psychosocial support and care to patients undergoing radiation therapy. Norwegian RTTs described protecting relational care through scheduling flexibility and supportive environments. Canadian RTTs described delivering PSSC through structured assessments and integrating tasks within time- and staffing-constrained environment. Shared barriers included limited time and variable awareness of resources.
conclusionNorwegian and Canadian RTTs described a strong commitment to PSSC, but organizational conditions shaped how care was delivered. Norwegian RTTs used a flexible patient-centered approach, while Canadian RTTs relied on a structured approach. Effective PSSC delivery requires alignment between RTTs' roles, targeted education, and institutional structures that support quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.