Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42706353›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Federated predictive load balancing for adaptive resource management in fog computing.

Arti Sharma, Rajendra Prasad Mahapatra, Vineet Sharma, Nripendra Narayan Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arti SharmaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ghaziabad, Delhi NCR, India.
Rajendra Prasad MahapatraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, , SRM Institute of Science and Technology. Delhi NCR, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vineet SharmaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Krishna Institute of Engineering & Technology (KIET), Ghaziabad, Delhi-NCR, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nripendra Narayan DasDepartment of Information Technology, Manipal University, Jaipur, India, Rajasthan. nripendranarayan.das@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the advantages of fog computing in delivering low-latency Internet of Things (IoT) applications are well understood, efficient load balancing remains a constant challenge due to the diversity of node capabilities and the uncertainty of workloads. Current scheduling methods are typically reactive and only take action once they detect congestion, and require gathering data centrally, which can be privacy and bandwidth sensitive. In this paper, a Federated Predictive Load Balancing (FPLB) framework is proposed to combine Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) workload forecasting with federated learning, which does not require fog nodes to share their operational data. Predicted workloads feed a normalized load index for proactive task assignment, while a differential-privacy mechanism with a Rényi accountant protects model updates during federated aggregation. All experiments are reported from a self-contained simulator. Across eight independent seeds under a moderate-to-high load, FPLB attains the lowest average task latency (149.2 ms), significantly below Deep Q-Network (DQN) scheduling (1.6% reduction; p < 0.01, Wilcoxon signed-rank) and a federated-DQN control, and well below reactive heuristics (24.3% below round-robin). The margin widens with load, reaching 2.9% over DQN at 10 tasks/s, and FPLB's latency variance is consistently the lowest, indicating more predictable scheduling. An ablation confirms that workload prediction is the primary driver of the improvement and that federation lowers prediction error. Federated communication overhead is 0.4% of network traffic at 50 nodes, rising to only 3.7% at 500 nodes, and performance is robust to 30% per-round node dropout. This paper further characterizes the privacy-utility envelope as the budget tightens from [Formula: see text] = 3.2 to 0.5. At low load, where congestion is rare, DQN is comparable, so the framework is most valuable for deployments that regularly experience dynamic or peak-heavy demand.

Indexed as

Differential privacyFederated learningFog computingInternet of thingsLoad balancingWorkload prediction

Identifiers

PMID42706353
PMCPMC13549980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.