ArticleScientific reports2026
Latent profiles of social networks and their association with digital health readiness among rural older adults with hypertension.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Person-centered approaches to social networks profiles and their association with digital health readiness (DHR) remain underexplored among rural older adults with hypertension. This study aimed to identify latent social networks profiles and examine their independent association with DHR in this population. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 576 rural older adults with hypertension by using the Lubben Social Network Scale-6 and the Digital Health Readiness Questionnaire (DHRQ) in Hunan Province, China. Latent profile analysis identified social networks profiles. Multivariable linear regression with forced entry examined the independent association between profiles and DHRQ after controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related confounders. Three profiles emerged: socially restricted (16.5%), moderately connected (65.3%), and well-integrated (18.2%). Social networks profiles remained independently associated with DHRQ (F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.