ReviewZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi2026
[Concepts and clinical practice of functional reconstruction of complex wounds].
Review in Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The repair of complex wounds has shifted from simple wound closure toward functional reconstruction. Nevertheless, a systematic exposition regarding their definition, the principles of functional reconstruction, and future directions is currently lacking. Based on a literature review and comprehensive analysis, this article proposes that the definition of complex wounds should incorporate four dimensions including abnormal healing timeline, involvement of anatomical structures, coexistence of multiple risk factors, and complex management requirements. Furthermore, the core concept of functional reconstruction for such wounds can be summarized into four-tiered principles: biological matching between donor and recipient sites, minimization of donor-site morbidity, restoration of aesthetic appearance and sensory function, and functional reconstruction of deep structures, including blood vessels, nerves, tendons, bones, and joints. This article systematically reviewed the developmental trajectory of complex wound reconstruction, from skin grafting as the cornerstone of wound repair, to microsurgery for functional reconstruction, and onward to the emergence of multidisciplinary regenerative strategies, highlighting the original contributions of Chinese investigators in this field. In the future, the deep integration of technologies such as regenerative medicine, intelligent navigation, super-microsurgery, and precision subtyping is expected to facilitate the transition of complex wound reconstruction from anatomical repair to functional regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.