ReviewZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2026
[Research Progress on Circulating Tumor DNA Status and Postoperative Central Nervous System Recurrence Risk and Overall Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].
Review in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the malignancies with the highest incidence and mortality rates worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the vast majority. Patients with postoperative central nervous system (CNS) metastasis have a dismal prognosis, highlighting the urgent need for more precise molecular biomarkers. Although circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based molecular residual disease (MRD) testing can predict postoperative recurrence, its utility in detecting CNS metastasis remains debated. This review examines the association between MRD status and CNS recurrence risk, synthesizes evidence linking MRD status to overall survival (OS), and explores mechanisms underlying false-negative results of peripheral blood MRD in CNS metastasis detection alongside potential clinical strategies. Current evidence indicates that MRD positivity correlates with increased overall recurrence risk and shortened OS; some studies suggest a potential increase in CNS recurrence, yet direct evidence specifically targeting intracranial recurrence-free survival (iRFS) remains insufficient. MRD-negative patients generally have favorable prognosis; however, a subset of high-risk patients - those with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, stage III disease, or adenocarcinoma - may still develop isolated CNS metastases, primarily due to the blood-brain barrier limiting ctDNA release. Adjuvant Osimertinib reduces CNS recurrence risk, though recurrence remains high within the first year after treatment discontinuation. MRD status serves as an important prognostic stratification tool after NSCLC resection, but negative peripheral blood MRD does not completely exclude CNS recurrence risk. Comprehensive assessment integrating imaging, risk factors, and cerebrospinal fluid testing is therefore warranted. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.