ReviewZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2026
[Digital Drainage Systems in Postoperative Chest Tube Management after Pulmonary Resection: Current Status and Future Perspectives].
Review in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest drainage management is an essential component of perioperative care after pulmonary resection, aiming to evacuate intrapleural air and fluid and promote lung re-expansion. However, conventional chest drainage systems mainly rely on manual observation, making continuous and quantitative assessment of air leakage difficult and resulting in subjective decision-making regarding the timing of chest tube removal. In recent years, digital drainage systems (DDS) have been increasingly applied in clinical practice. By using integrated sensors, DDS enables continuous monitoring of pleural pressure, air flow, and fluid drainage, and provides dynamic trend curves, thereby offering objective evidence for chest tube management. DDS may improve the accuracy of drainage assessment and optimize chest tube management strategies; however, its widespread adoption remains influenced by factors such as cost, clinical experience, and healthcare system differences. This review summarizes the current application status, advantages, and challenges of DDS in postoperative chest drainage management after pulmonary resection. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.