ArticlePersonality and mental health2026
Can ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Dimensions Be Categorically Specified?
Article in Personality and mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The new ICD-11 Personality Disorder (PD) classification introduces a global severity classification (i.e., mild, moderate, and severe) of personality dysfunction, which may be further accompanied by up to five trait domain specifiers delineating individual manifestations of personality disturbance (i.e., Negative affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, Disinhibition, and Anankastia). Although these trait domains are conceptualized as dimensions, the ICD-11 only allows clinicians to code them as being categorically present versus absent. It is therefore appropriate to examine the ability of clinicians' judgements in capturing variance in trait domains using dichotomous trait ratings. A total sample of 238 patients was characterized by their clinicians using both dimensional and dichotomous single-item ratings for each trait domain. Subsequently, clinicians filled out the Informant Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (IPiC) as a standardized criterion-measure for trait domains. The dichotomous ratings were all moderately associated with their corresponding IPiC score, except for Negative Affectivity, which only showed a small but statistically significant association. The dimensional ratings were all moderately to strongly associated with their corresponding IPiC scores. However, only the dimensional single-item ratings of Disinhibition and Dissociality were significantly superior to the dichotomous single-item ratings in capturing the IPiC trait domain scores. Findings overall support the use of categorical assignment of trait domain specifiers in the ICD-11 although dimensional formats improve the accuracy of clinicians' judgements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.