ArticleAnnals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism2026
Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities and 1-year growth response in children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency.
Article in Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond anatomy - A commentary on "Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities and 1-year growth response in children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency".Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBrain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to assess anatomical abnormalities in children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (IGHD), but its prognostic relevance remains uncertain. We investigated whether structural abnormalities on brain MRI are associated with 1-year growth response to recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy in Korean children with IGHD.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 457 IGHD patients from the LG Growth Study registry who had baseline brain MRI and received rhGH therapy for ≥1 year. MRI findings were categorized as normal or as showing pituitary or extrapituitary abnormalities. Growth outcomes-change in height SDS (ΔHeight SDS) and height velocity-were compared across groups. Multivariable regression was performed to adjust for clinical variables.
resultsAmong 457 patients, 122 (26.7%) had structural abnormalities on brain MRI, while 335 (73.3%) had normal findings. In unadjusted analysis, those with abnormalities showed slightly lower ΔHeight SDS than those with normal brain MRI (p=0.028). However, subgroup differences were not significant when analyzed categorically. In multivariable regression, younger age at treatment (β=-0.050, p=0.004), higher baseline body mass index SDS (β=0.055, p=0.002), and greater rhGH dose (β=0.806, p=0.039) were significantly associated with greater ΔHeight SDS, while brain MRI abnormalities were not predictive of response.
conclusionWhile brain MRI is an important diagnostic tool in IGHD for identifying anatomical abnormalities, our findings suggest that such abnormalities, particularly when mild or isolated, have limited utility in predicting short-term growth response to rhGH therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.