ArticleAnalytical biochemistry2027
Best practices for isothermal titration calorimetry of protein-DNA interactions.
Article in Analytical biochemistry, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) is a powerful label-free method for quantifying protein-DNA interactions, providing direct measurements of binding affinity, stoichiometry, enthalpy, and entropy in a single experiment. However, the quality of protein-DNA ITC data depends strongly on experimental details, including accurate concentration determination, careful buffer matching, sample quality, instrument cleanliness, sample loading, degassing, and calibration. Without careful control, these factors can obscure true binding behavior and complicate thermodynamic interpretation. Here, we present a practical checklist for designing, optimizing, and troubleshooting ITC experiments for protein-DNA binding studies. Using homeodomain transcription factor-DNA interactions as representative examples, we identify common failure modes, including concentration errors, buffer mismatch, poorly optimized binding-partner concentrations, sample carryover, cell or syringe contamination, loading artifacts, and calibration problems. For each potential issue, we outline how to recognize the problem, choose appropriate controls, and apply corrective strategies to improve data quality and reproducibility. Together, this checklist provides a practical framework for improving protein-DNA ITC experiments by helping researchers distinguish genuine binding behavior from correctable technical artifacts and generate more reliable thermodynamic measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.