Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42705197›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Active-controlled commercial field evaluation of an independently developed fluralaner oral solution for poultry red mite control in laying hens.

Ziyao Liu, Jie Xie, Weichun Wu, Yicheng Zhang, Ao Guo, Xin Shen, Yu Du, Li Li, Xianhui Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ziyao LiuGuangdong Key Laboratory for Veterinary Drug Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Electronic address: liuyy1996@163.com.
Jie XieGuangdong Key Laboratory for Veterinary Drug Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Electronic address: xiejiekitty@scau.edu.cn.
Weichun WuGuangdong Key Laboratory for Veterinary Drug Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yicheng ZhangGuangdong Key Laboratory for Veterinary Drug Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Ao GuoChina Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, 100081, China.
Xin ShenChina Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yu DuChina Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, 100081, China.
Li LiCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Xianhui HuangGuangdong Key Laboratory for Veterinary Drug Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Electronic address: xhhuang@scau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae, PRM) remains an important ectoparasite in commercial laying-hen production, and drinking-water administration of systemic acaricides provides a practical option for whole-flock control. This study compared the field efficacy and laying performance of an independently developed 10 mg/mL fluralaner oral solution with Exzolt 10 mg/mL Solution and assessed target-animal safety and bioequivalence. A double-blind, active-controlled trial was conducted at a naturally infested commercial layer farm with a 5-row × 5-tier cage system. The products were randomly assigned to 2 independent drinking-water systems with farm-installed proportional dosing devices, with 2,400 hens monitored per area. Fluralaner was administered at 0.5 mg/kg on d 0 and d 7. Mite-trap counts, infestation severity, adverse events, and laying rate were monitored. Mean mite reduction exceeded 98% by d 1 and 99% by d 3, reached 100% by d 14, and remained above 99% through d 90. Infestation scores declined from 2.70 ± 0.67 and 2.80 ± 0.42 before treatment to 0.10 ± 0.32 and 0.20 ± 0.42 by d 7 in the test and reference areas, respectively, and were 0 from d 14 onward. Exploratory between-area comparisons detected no significant differences in mite reduction or infestation scores. Laying rate remained stable, and no treatment-related adverse events were observed. In the target-animal safety study, 80 hens received untreated water or the test product at 1 ×, 3 ×, and 5 × the recommended dose, with no consistent dose-related adverse effects identified in clinical, hematological, biochemical, pathological, production, or egg-quality outcomes. In the bioequivalence study, 66 hens received a single 0.5 mg/kg oral dose of either product. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of C

Indexed as

Drinking-water administrationFluralanerLaying henLaying performancePoultry red mite

Identifiers

PMID42705197
PMCPMC13572189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.