ArticlePoultry science2026
Comparative evaluation of different chilling methods on carcass and meat quality traits of pigeons.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of different chilling methods on carcass traits, physicochemical properties, and sensory attributes of indigenous pigeon (Columba livia domestica) carcasses. Two hundred pigeon's carcass was assigned to four treatment groups: no chilling (control), iced water chilling (30 min), and conventional chilling (3 h and 24 h) at 4°C. After the birds were slaughtered, their carcass was assigned into the treatment groups. Then carcass rate and dressing rate were calculated for all treatment groups. The breast muscle was used to measure physicochemical properties, including pH, color, water-holding capacity, cooking loss, shear force, and proximate analysis. Among the different chilling methods compared, the highest carcass rate was observed in the 30 min iced water chilling (42.73%), while the lowest rate was found in the 24 h chilling (35.78%). The dressing rate and retail cuts were both significantly decreased (P < 0.05) after 24 h of chilling compared to the others. In 3 h, conventional chilling moisture content was significantly reduced, but protein, fat, and ash content were increased to a major extent. The conventional chilling showed the highest (P < 0.05) water-holding capacity and the lowest pH, cooking loss, and shear force value. A lower L* (lightness) value and a higher a* (redness) value was observed (P < 0.05) at 3 h of conventional chilling. In sensory evaluations, the 3 h chilled carcasses were scored higher in juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability. The short-term conventional chilling method is the most effective one for improving the physicochemical and sensory attributes of pigeon meat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.