Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42705193›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Feature engineering, parameter optimization, and interpretable modeling for accelerometer-based behavior recognition in aviary laying hens.

Xiao Yang, Luwei Nie, Qunpeng Niu, Xiaoqiang Li, Juncheng Ma, Chaoyuan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiao YangCollege of Water Resources and Intelligence Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, 100083, China.
Luwei NieCollege of Animal Science, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, 750021, China.
Qunpeng NiuCollege of Water Resources and Intelligence Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Xiaoqiang LiCollege of Water Resources and Intelligence Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Juncheng MaCollege of Water Resources and Intelligence Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, 100083, China.
Chaoyuan WangCollege of Water Resources and Intelligence Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, 100083, China. Electronic address: gotowchy@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavior monitoring is essential for assessing the health and welfare of laying hens. As the dominant trend in global egg production, aviary systems introduce considerable challenges for behavior recognition. Existing studies remain fragmented and lack standardized analytical guidelines for sliding window configuration, feature selection, and model choice, making it difficult to compare results across studies and to develop robust, generalizable systems. Therefore, this study proposes a comprehensive framework for accelerometer-based behavior recognition. A total of 25 Hy-Line laying hens were reared in an aviary system at the age of 65 weeks. Ten light-weight accelerometers were attached to the wings of selected birds to collect behavioral data at a sampling frequency of 15 Hz. Resting, drinking, feeding, walking, and flying behaviors were investigated in this study. Hundreds of features were automatically extracted using scalable hypothesis testing, and the effects of feature quantity on model performance was evaluated. Five machine learning (ML) models and four deep learning (DL) models were compared under four sliding window sizes (1 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s) and five overlap ratios (0%, 25%, 50%, 70%, and 90%), to determine the optimal configuration. Additionally, interpretability analysis was conducted for the best-performing ML model. The results indicated that Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN) achieved the best performance among ML and DL models, respectively. XGB achieved an overall accuracy of 0.985 and an F1 score of 0.987, while 1D-CNN achieved an accuracy of 0.985 and an F1 score of 0.985. The optimal configuration was a 3-s sliding window with 50% overlap. Model interpretation revealed that acceleration variability, amplitude, and energy-related features were the most influential for behavior discrimination, with significant interactions among features. This study provides practical insights for developing acceleration-based behavior classification technologies and supports precision poultry management.

Indexed as

AccelerationBehaviorDeep learningLaying henMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42705193
PMCPMC13572173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.