ArticlePoultry science2026
Research note: Efficient preservation of genome-edited chicken germplasm via N-methylacetamide-based semen cryopreservation.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of genome-edited chicken lines for agricultural and biomedical use requires effective methods for long-term preservation. In birds, cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos is challenging due to the structure of the egg. This makes semen cryopreservation one of the most practical alternatives, however, this method has not been validated in genome-edited chickens. This study evaluated the feasibility of cryopreserving semen from genome-edited chickens using an N-methylacetamide (N-MA)-based protocol. Two genome-edited chicken lines were used in this study which are a DAZL-GFP germ cell reporter line and a RAG1 knockout line. Semen was stored for either one week or one month prior to assessing fertility and hatchability. The results demonstrated that cryopreserved semen from both genome-edited chicken lines maintained their fertilizing capacity, with no significant differences in fertility or hatchability compared to cryopreserved wild-type groups at either storage duration. Hatchability remained above 80% across all groups, indicating that semen cryopreservation did not significantly affect embryo development after successful fertilization. Furthermore, SYBR-14/PI staining revealed no significant differences in sperm viability between genome-edited and control groups, although both showed a significant decrease in viability compared to fresh semen. These findings demonstrate that N-MA-based semen cryopreservation provides a reliable and practical method for the preservation of genome-edited chicken lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.