ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2026
Pattern of Audio Telehealth Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe Medicare telehealth expansion increased telehealth use, but the utilization patterns of audio-only telehealth remain unclear among those with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs). We aimed to describe 2020 to 2022 trends in audio-only telehealth utilization and provider specialty and to examine variations in utilization patterns by patient characteristics within the ADRD population.
designCohort study. SETTING AND
participantsWe identified 5,021,632 Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of ADRD enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service plans between 2020 and 2022.
methodsUsing Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2020 to 2022, we described the modality of evaluation and management (E&M) visits. We calculated the proportion of E&M visits delivered via telehealth and audio-only and described the provider specialty. To further explore the pattern of telehealth use during the later stages of the pandemic, we used 2022 data to classify telehealth users into audio-only, supplementary, and video-only categories. We examined its association with individual race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and rurality using a linear probability model and a multinomial logistic regression. Average marginal effects were estimated.
resultsOverall, E&M telehealth visits among beneficiaries with ADRD declined from 21% in 2020 to 8% in 2022, whereas the audio-only share remained stable at around 20%. Over half of audio-only visits were furnished by primary care providers. Among telehealth users, traditionally underserved populations were significantly more likely to rely exclusively on audio-only visits and less likely to use them as supplemental care. For example, higher adjusted probabilities of exclusive audio-only use were observed among Black individuals (+0.4 percentage points; P < .01) and rural beneficiaries (+0.8 percentage points; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Audio-only telehealth services were consistently used by Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD during the study period. Continued coverage for audio-only services could be a potential approach to promote digital health equity for older adults with ADRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.