ReviewDrug delivery2026
Skin physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: current research progress, software comparison, and future perspectives.
Review in Drug delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transdermal and topical delivery systems (TDS) have emerged as the third-largest route of administration due to their ability to bypass first-pass metabolism and maintain stable plasma concentrations. Skin physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models mechanistically characterize the percutaneous absorption process, predict local and systemic exposure, and enhance research and development efficiency through virtual clinical trials. This paper first elaborates on the theoretical foundation of skin PBPK modeling based on Fick's second law of diffusion and compares the model assumptions and application scenarios of four well-established and validated modeling platforms: Simcyp, GastroPlus, Skin-CAD, and PK-Sim. The findings indicate that Simcyp provides a refined depiction of skin physiological structure and is widely applied in clinical evaluation and special population prediction. GastroPlus focuses more on the mechanistic description of TDS formulations. Skin-CAD, as a specialized software, is extensively utilized for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.