ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Same Sex Chromosomes With Independent Origins in Haplochromine Cichlids.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elucidating theories of sex chromosome evolution requires approaches that allow fine scale delimitations of sex-determining regions within a phylogenetic context. This can address whether shared sex chromosomes across related species are due to shared ancestry, or whether genetic sex-determining regions have repeatedly evolved. Haplochromine cichlids, as one of the most successful fish lineages on Earth, have been a focal study system of sex chromosome research, both because of their rapid rate of sex chromosome turnover and the repeated emergence of certain sex chromosomes across the lineage. Here, we newly describe sex chromosomes in members of the earliest branch of the modern haplochromines, the Tropheini, based on whole-genome sequencing data, using a combination of SNP- and kmers-based methods. We show that despite the repeated co-options of ancestral chromosomes LG5 and LG7 in these species, the origins of these sex chromosomes are independent. Investigation of gene functions, allele differences, and sex-biased gene expression within the discovered sex-linked regions provides no evidence that sexual antagonism has driven the repeated evolution of a region on LG5 that overlaps between four of these species. By comparing the sex-determining regions on LG5 and LG7 across haplochromines, we show that a common origin is unlikely, and that while sex chromosomes themselves may be shared between several Haplochromini, the sex-determining genes or mechanism likely differ. This study paves the way to explore newly emerging theories of sex chromosome evolution, such as the role of chromosomal fusion or recombination patterns across the genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.