ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Perceptions of and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Underserved Baltimore and Eastern Shore Populations.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of preventable cancer mortality, with persistent screening disparities in underserved communities. This qualitative study aimed to identify community-specific barriers to CRC screening among two distinct Maryland populations to inform the development of tailored educational materials. We conducted four in-person focus groups with 24 adults, consisting of residents from Baltimore City (BC) and the rural Maryland Eastern Shore (ES). Semi-structured guides explored CRC screening knowledge, perceived barriers, trusted information sources, and preferences for educational content. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by two researchers using thematic analysis. There were significant differences between screening barriers in both populations. In the BC population, key barriers included lack of CRC symptom knowledge, stigma surrounding colorectal procedures, lack of recommendation for screening, and use of medical jargon during appointments. Participants emphasized the importance of plain language, visual aids, and community-specific references to increase CRC screening. In the ES population, key barriers included disengagement with healthcare, not pursuing medical care outside of emergencies, and significant logistical challenges. Participants emphasized the importance of incentives to encourage involvement with the healthcare system as well as using community health workers to help decrease logistic barriers to CRC screening. Within the state of Maryland, there are significantly different CRC screening barriers among BC and ES populations. This study elucidates the value of community-engaged approaches in developing CRC screening educational materials. These findings provide a foundation for future interventions and health education in similar underserved settings.
Identifiers
42704593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.