ArticleInternational ophthalmology2026
Multimodal AI in retinal disease: from images to decisions and real-world endpoints.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeArtificial intelligence (AI) has achieved substantial progress in retinal image classification and disease screening, butits clinical value will ultimately depend on whether it can support meaningful decisions across the patient journey. This Opening Editorial introduces the Special Collection "Multimodal AI in Retinal Disease: Imaging, Clinical Data, and Real-World Endpoints" and outlines priorities for the clinical translation of multimodal retinal AI. OVERVIEW: Multimodal AI offers an opportunity to integrate fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, OCTangiography, ultra-widefield imaging, and other retinal modalities with clinical characteristics, treatment history, and longitudinal change. Such integration may improve risk stratification, disease monitoring, treatment-response prediction, and individualized follow-up. However, adding modalities or increasing model scale does not in itself establish clinical utility. Future studies should demonstrate incremental value over strong unimodal and clinical baselines, address missing data and distribution shifts, and validate performance across institutions, devices, and diverse patient populations. Evaluation should extend beyond retrospective discrimination metrics to outcomes relevant to patients and health systems, including visual function, referral appropriateness, time to treatment, treatment burden, safety, access, and patient experience. Transparent reference standards, independent external validation, uncertainty assessment, and rigorous reporting are also essential.
conclusionThe next phase of retinal AI research should move beyond technical performance toward clinically meaningful, externally validated, and patient-centered evaluation. Multimodal AI will have greatest impact when it demonstrates reliable incremental value and supports trustworthy, equitable, and scalable decision-making in real-world retinal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42704550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.