ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026
The 2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guidelines: Key Updates, Historical Context, and Clinical Implications.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review examines the 2025 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology multisociety hypertension guideline, placing its recommendations in historical context and evaluating the supporting evidence across major clinical populations. RECENT
findingsThe 2025 guideline retains the 2017 blood pressure categories and treatment goal of less than 130/80 mmHg but introduces the race-free PREVENT equations, uses a 7.5% 10-year risk threshold to guide pharmacologic treatment of stage-1 hypertension, and encourages systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg in selected high-risk patients. Additional updates include single-pill combination therapy for stage-2 hypertension, broader primary aldosteronism screening, routine urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio measurement, removal of race-based drug selection, and cautious incorporation of renal denervation. Recent trials strengthen the evidence for intensive lowering, including in diabetes and older adults. The 2025 guideline advances a risk-based, measurement-dependent approach. The principal challenge is no longer identifying effective treatments but delivering accurate measurement, timely intensification, and sustained follow-up at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.