ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Cerebral hemodynamics, autoregulation, and neurocognitive outcomes during Trendelenburg positioning in robot-assisted abdominopelvic surgery: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted abdominopelvic surgery often combines carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum with steep Trendelenburg positioning. Together, these exposures can alter arterial inflow, venous outflow, intracranial downstream pressure, and systemic hemodynamics. We conducted a structured search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library from inception through 24 August 2026 and used narrative synthesis to integrate direct human evidence from robotic surgery with indirect evidence from other clinical settings. Fifty-five eligible full-text reports, representing 48 independent studies, were included. The direct evidence consisted mainly of small studies of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Pneumoperitoneum may increase systemic vascular resistance, so mean arterial pressure can remain stable or rise even while cardiac output and cerebral blood flow fall. Head-down tilt, higher thoracoabdominal pressure, and impaired jugular drainage may also increase central venous and intracranial pressure, reducing effective cerebral perfusion pressure. Near-infrared spectroscopy, optic nerve sheath diameter, mean velocity index, cerebral oximetry index, and direct flow measurements interrogate different parts of this physiology. When downstream pressure changes over time, a low or negative autoregulation index cannot exclude restricted cerebral perfusion. No evidence shows that raising mean arterial pressure alone or targeting a specific autoregulation threshold improves neurocognitive outcomes. Perioperative management should integrate brain-level arterial pressure, cardiac output, carbon dioxide, and venous drainage while addressing modifiable surgical factors. Future studies should standardize operative exposure, synchronize arterial and venous measurements, and use consistent neurocognitive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42704510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.