Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42704468›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Limited observed efficacy of olfactory training in severe long-term post-COVID-19 syndrome: a prospective cohort study.

Kathrin Kobus, Constantin Hintschich, Tomáš Palla, Theresa Griesbeck, Christopher Bohr, Veronika Vielsmeier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathrin KobusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany. kathrin.kobus@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-4396
Constantin HintschichDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Tomáš PallaDepartment of Infectiology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Theresa GriesbeckDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Christopher BohrDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Veronika VielsmeierDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePersistent chemosensory dysfunction is a debilitating symptom of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome (PCS). While olfactory training (OT) is effective in early post-viral smell loss, its efficacy in chronic, multisystemic PCS remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize a severely affected cohort and to evaluate changes in olfactory function during a structured OT intervention.

methodsIn this prospective study, 29 patients with persistent PCS lasting > 12 weeks (mean duration approximately 30 months) were recruited from a specialized post-COVID outpatient clinic. All patients underwent structured OT (standardized twice-daily exposure protocol) for 12 weeks. Participants underwent psychophysical testing (Sniffin' Sticks TDI, Taste Strips) and completed questionnaires (self-MOQ, VAS, EQ-5D-5 L) before and after a 12-week OT period.

resultsOf 25 patients included in the final analysis, 9 presented with psychophysical anosmia based on the TDI score. The cohort exhibited a high symptom burden, with health-related quality of life below population norms. Following OT, no statistically significant changes were observed in the objective TDI scores (19.0 ± 8.2 vs. 20.1 ± 10.5; p = 0.52). Similarly, subjective ratings (VAS) and questionnaires assessing olfactory quality of life showed no significant differences between baseline and follow-up. While individual transient improvements were reported, a persistant discrepancy between objective data and subjective perception was observed.

conclusionStructured olfactory training was not associated with measurable improvement within the 12-week observation period in this cohort of chronic PCS patients. The lack of response may indicate that, in this severely affected subgroup, the effectiveness of olfactory training may be limited by factors beyond peripheral olfactory dysfunction, including reduced cognitive and functional capacity.

Indexed as

AnosmiaOlfactory dysfunctionOlfactory trainingPost-COVID syndromeQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.