Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42704413›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2026

Low-Dose Atropine and Other Interventions for Pediatric Myopia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Post-treatment Outcomes.

Jelena Jovanović, Maria Zacharioudaki, Marilena Kalatzi, Georgios Papadakis, Nagarjuna Mulkalapalli, Frederic Ernst, Thom de Milliano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jelena JovanovićIQVIA, 37 North Wharf Road, London, UK. jelena.jovanovic1@iqvia.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6155-0870
Maria ZacharioudakiIQVIA, Munich, Germany.
Marilena KalatziIQVIA SA, Athens, Greece.
Georgios PapadakisIQVIA SA, Athens, Greece.
Nagarjuna MulkalapalliIQVIA, Gurugram, India.
Frederic ErnstSanten Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany.
Thom de MillianoSanten SA, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough the comparative efficacy of interventions for pediatric myopia control has been explored, the trade-off between on-treatment efficacy and post-treatment rebound remains unclear. We evaluated the comparative efficacy and durability of effect of low-dose atropine (LDA, <0.1%) vs other interventions for pediatric myopia using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of interventions for pediatric myopia were identified through a systematic review. Outcomes included change from baseline in spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and axial length (AL) after 1 or 2 years of treatment, and 12 months after treatment cessation. Evidence was synthesized in a hierarchical Bayesian NMA with a dose-response ordering constraint model to improve precision and interpretability for decision-making. Heterogeneity was explored in network meta-regressions (NMR).

resultsThe systematic review identified 117 RCTs evaluating 24 active interventions. Twenty-two RCTs and one study arm were excluded from quantitative synthesis because of missing outcomes or violation of the transitivity assumption. LDA concentrations ≥0.01% significantly slowed myopia progression compared with an inactive control over 2 years in a dose-dependent manner and showed numerically larger, though statistically non-significant, effects compared with optical interventions. Moderate‑to‑high dose atropine and repeated low‑intensity red‑light, alone or combined with orthokeratology, showed greater short‑term efficacy; however, 12 months post‑cessation, these interventions were associated with clinically meaningful rebound exceeding progression in untreated controls. In contrast, LDA was not associated with clinically meaningful rebound. Combining 0.01% atropine with orthokeratology improved efficacy relative to LDA monotherapy over 2 years, but post-treatment rebound data were unavailable. NMRs indicated baseline SER, baseline progression, geography, and race as effect modifiers, albeit with borderline significance.

conclusionsThese findings describe the comparative efficacy and rebound profiles of treatments for pediatric myopia. Within the current evidence base, atropine concentrations of 0.01% to 0.05% showed sustained on-treatment benefit with minimal post-treatment rebound.

Indexed as

AtropineDose-dependent modelMyopia reboundNMAPediatric myopiaPediatric ophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID42704413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.