ArticleActa parasitologica2026
Epidemiological and Clinical-Laboratorial Profile of Schistosomiasis in an Endemic Urban Area in Pernambuco, Brazil.
Article in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Brazil, although schistosomiasis mansoni is estimated to present positivity and severe infection rates below 5% in endemic states, there are inequalities among regions represented by municipalities showing moderate and high positivity rates. This study aimed to describe the epidemiological and clinical-laboratory profiles of an urban area. A cross-sectional ecological study was conducted in Novo Horizonte, Jaboatão dos Guararapes, state of Pernambuco, Brazil. The study area was mapped using a GPS receiver, a parasitological survey was performed (using Kato-Katz and Hoffman, Pons e Janer techniques), and clinical evaluations were conducted using upper abdominal ultrasonography (US) and socioenvironmental conditions related to household and peridomestic environments were performed. Based on parasitological techniques, 23.68% positivity rate was found, 66.67% male individuals, and a 284.5 eggs per gram mean. Using molecular biology techniques, the prevalence has increased to 28.94%. US was performed in 55 infected and 57 non-infected individuals, of which 31 and 19 presented periportal fibrosis (PPF), respectively. Infected individuals with PPF presented a larger portal vein diameter and had a higher frequency in males. The Novo Horizonte showed a moderate positivity rate within a municipality considered to have low endemicity. The results highlight the need to carry out frequent parasitological surveys, increased active case finding and the use of other more sensitive diagnosis methods. More targeted studies are needed to better understand the dynamics of schistosomiasis transmission in this locality, as well as the health consequences for exposed and infected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.