ReviewDer Nervenarzt2026
Rodent models of aggression: from mechanisms to clinical translation.
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aggression is an evolutionarily conserved social behavior that becomes clinically relevant when it loses contextual and inhibitory regulation. Rodent models do not serve to reproduce the full complexity of human violence, with its legal, moral, cultural, and interpersonal dimensions. Their translational value lies instead in making core mechanisms of aggression regulation experimentally accessible. This article discusses how rodent models help to distinguish adaptive from dysregulated aggression; to select clinically informative paradigms; and to identify causal pathways that shape attack threshold, escalation, persistence, reward value, and inhibitory control. Rodent studies have mapped a multilevel control architecture in which social sensory threat is appraised through amygdala-hypothalamic pathways, hypothalamic and midbrain circuits organize attack-related behavior, and corticostriatal systems contribute to motivation and regulatory control. Rather than acting as fixed modules, these circuits are shaped by experience, internal state, sex and endocrine modulation, immune signaling, and aggression-related reward. Next-generation models should therefore complement traditional reductionist assays with longitudinal trajectories, socially embedded phenotyping, dysregulation readouts, and measures of distributed network and body-brain states. Within TRR 379, rodent models enable mechanism-focused translation by helping to identify biosignatures and modifiable pathways for future interventions in dysregulated aggression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42704387What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.