ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Towards the digital analytical sciences in chemistry and biochemistry: from FAIR data ecosystems to artificial intelligence.
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The chemical and biochemical sciences are undergoing a profound digital transformation that is giving rise to the emerging paradigm of the digital analytical sciences, driven by an increasing need for research data digitalization, structuring, and standardization. This Trends article provides a bird's-eye view of how FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data ecosystems are evolving from administrative guidelines into a critical enabler of modern analytical discovery. Because major advances in artificial intelligence (AI) depend fundamentally on structured and openly accessible scientific data, we discuss how the analytical sciences are now laying the corresponding infrastructural foundations needed to support the next generation of data-driven research. However, in domains such as biophotonics and advanced spectroscopy, large, comprehensively annotated experimental datasets remain limited, and algorithmic advances alone cannot fully compensate for data scarcity or poor standardization. To address this challenge, we examine the rapidly emerging field of physics-informed deep learning, in which physical laws and domain knowledge are incorporated directly into AI pipelines. By leveraging quantum-chemical simulations and transfer-matrix optics to generate synthetic pretraining data, these hybrid approaches can improve the robustness and generalizability of predictive models trained on limited experimental datasets. Finally, we discuss the emerging role of scientific representation learning and argue that realizing the full potential of AI in chemistry will require continued advances in hybrid algorithms alongside a sustained commitment to FAIR data governance and open scientific data infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42704371What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.