ArticleCritical care medicine2026
Evaluation of a Rapid Immunoassay for Molecular Subphenotype Classification in Pediatric Acute Cardiorespiratory Failure.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMolecular subphenotypes, identified through latent class analysis (LCA) of biomarker profiles, have the potential to guide targeted therapeutics in critical care. We have previously published that intensive insulin management has subphenotype-specific beneficial effects among children with hyperglycemia accompanying cardiorespiratory failure. However, the real-time application of subphenotype-based strategies in clinical settings remains challenging due to the operational aspects of biomarker assays. Our study had three objectives: 1) to compare biomarker measurements from rapid immunoassay and conventional multiplex platforms; 2) to evaluate the cross-platform transportability of a conventional assay-based parsimonious classifier for LCA-derived subphenotypes and compare it with a classifier trained directly on rapid immunoassay data; and 3) to assess the prognostic and predictive significance of rapid immunoassay-based subphenotypes.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingMulticenter PICUs. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty-nine critically ill children with acute cardiorespiratory failure and hyperglycemia (2012-2016).
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsLCA was previously used to derive hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory classes using a conventional multiplex assay of 13 plasma biomarkers. After feature selection, a parsimonious classifier using interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR-1) was developed to predict LCA-derived subphenotypes. We applied this classifier to rapid immunoassay biomarker measurements, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95). However, calibration was poor due to systematic underestimation of sTNFR-1 concentrations by the rapid platform. We then derived and internally validated via bootstrapping a de novo classifier using rapid immunoassay data, achieving an AUROC of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95) and excellent calibration. Using a probability threshold of ≥ 0.5, the de novo classifier matched LCA-derived classifications in 241 of 269 cases (accuracy 89.6%). Rapid immunoassay-based subphenotypes demonstrated differences in mortality (33.3% in hyperinflammatory vs. 11.8% in hypoinflammatory; p = 0.009) and differential response to intensive insulin management (interaction p = 0.024).
conclusionsA parsimonious, rapid immunoassay-based classifier can approximate LCA-derived molecular subphenotypes while preserving their prognostic and predictive significance, with the potential to inform future subphenotype-based precision trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42704284What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.