ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
scDiagnostics: systematic assessment of cell type annotation in single-cell transcriptomics data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benchmarking large-scale single-cell RNA-seq analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although cell type annotation has become an integral part of single-cell analysis workflows, the assessment of computational annotations remains challenging. Many annotation tools transfer labels from an annotated reference dataset to a new query dataset of interest, but blindly transferring labels from one dataset to another has its own set of challenges. Often enough there is no perfect alignment between datasets, especially when transferring annotations from a healthy reference atlas for the discovery of disease states. We present scDiagnostics, a new open-source software package that facilitates the detection of complex or ambiguous annotation cases that may otherwise go unnoticed, thus addressing a critical unmet need in current single-cell analysis workflows. scDiagnostics is equipped with novel diagnostic methods that are compatible with all major cell type annotation tools. We demonstrate that scDiagnostics reliably detects complex or conflicting annotations using both carefully designed simulated datasets and diverse real-world single-cell datasets. Our evaluation demonstrates that scDiagnostics reliably identifies misleading annotations that systematically distort downstream analysis and interpretation and that would otherwise remain undetected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.