ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Dynamic multimodal survival prediction in multiple myeloma integrating gene expression, longitudinal laboratory measurements, and treatment history.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prognostic stratification in multiple myeloma (MM) relies on staging systems fixed at diagnosis, discarding temporal information accumulated during treatment. We developed a dynamic multimodal framework that predicts residual overall survival from observation windows of 1-18 months post-diagnosis. The model integrates DeepInsight-transformed gene expression, longitudinal trajectories of 10 laboratory analytes, and treatment history through missingness-aware gated fusion. On the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) cohort from the Relating Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile (CoMMpass) study (n = 752), five-fold-specific models trained on the development dataset achieved a mean concordance index (C-index) of 0.773 ± 0.024 and 1-year time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.789 ± 0.021 on a common held-out CoMMpass validation split, outperforming the evaluated survival-learning baselines including DeepSurv, a Cox proportional hazards neural network, and random survival forests. Kaplan-Meier stratification showed significant separation at all primary landmarks (log-rank $P<.001$, hazard ratios 3.46-3.93). A distilled student model retaining only the DeepInsight gene expression representation and five baseline clinical features transferred to an independent microarray cohort (GSE24080, n = 507) without retraining, achieving a C-index of 0.672 and a time-dependent AUC at 1-year of 0.740, supporting cross-cohort transferability in a reduced-input setting. Interpretability analyses recovered ubiquitin-proteasome, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and Interferon Alpha Response signals consistent with established myeloma biology. These findings support the potential of dynamic multimodal modeling for longitudinal prognostic assessment in MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.