Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42704270›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

CoMR: an integrative scoring pipeline for comprehensive mitochondrial proteome reconstruction across eukaryotes.

Julie Boisard, Shelby K Williams, Andrew J Roger, Courtney W Stairs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie BoisardDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6191-6149
Shelby K WilliamsInstitute for Comparative Genomics, Dalhousie University, 5850 College Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada.
Andrew J RogerInstitute for Comparative Genomics, Dalhousie University, 5850 College Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada.
Courtney W StairsDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6650-0970

Funding

CIHR FRN-142349European Research Council 101078476European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 101078476Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2022-05430Swedish Research Council with access to the UPPMAX and PDC computational infrastructures 2022-06725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial proteome reconstruction from eukaryotic sequence data typically relies on prediction of mitochondrial targeting signals (MTSs). However, MTS predictors are primarily trained on model organisms and may perform poorly in phylogenetically divergent lineages or in organisms with atypical or reduced targeting sequences. Accurate reconstruction therefore requires integration of complementary sources of evidence beyond targeting prediction alone. We developed Comprehensive Mitochondrial Reconstructor (CoMR), an integrative workflow that combines targeting prediction, curated homology searches, large-scale similarity searches, and automated phylogenetic analysis within a unified scoring framework. Benchmarking on the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae yielded strong discriminatory performance [receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-area under the curve (AUC) = 0.92], exceeding standalone prediction with TargetP2, a predictor of N-terminal targeting peptides (ROC-AUC = 0.72). In the divergent anaerobic protist Paratrimastix pyriformis, CoMR maintained robust performance (ROC-AUC = 0.86) validated with an experimental proteome despite extreme class imbalance, achieving a precision-recall AUC of 0.183 (~78-fold enrichment over random expectation and ~10-fold improvement over TargetP2). Ablation analyses demonstrate that predictive performance is robust to individual evidence-layer removal, while overlap analyses showed that homology-based searches recovered candidates missed by targeting predictors, particularly in P. pyriformis. Overall, CoMR improves mitochondrial proteome reconstruction over targeting prediction alone and provides a reproducible workflow for predicting mitochondrial and mitochondrion-related organelle protein repertoires across eukaryotes to aid investigations of organelle evolution and proteome reduction.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyEukaryotaMitochondriaMitochondrial ProteinsProteomeProteomicsSoftwarePhylogenySaccharomyces cerevisiaeMitochondrial ProteinsProteomeintegrative evidence scoringmitochondrial proteome reconstructionmitochondrial targeting signals predictionmitochondrion-related organellesorganelle evolutionreproducible bioinformatics workflow

Identifiers

PMID42704270
PMCPMC13548318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.