ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
A flexible framework for robust and efficient Mendelian randomization with debiasing.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mendelian randomization (MR) has been widely used to infer causal relationships between exposures and outcomes in epidemiological studies. However, classical MR assumptions can be violated when genetic variants are associated with outcomes through pathways other than the exposure, leading to uncorrelated and/or correlated pleiotropy. Additionally, measurement error arising from the inherent uncertainty in summary statistics obtained from large-scale genome-wide association studies can introduce bias into the causal effect estimate. To address these issues, we develop a debiased mixture inverse variance weighting ($\mathsf{dmIVW}$) method with three major advantages. First, it is capable of simultaneously handling various types of pleiotropy and eliminating the bias caused by uncertainty. Second, it can guard against distortion caused by invalid genetic variants while effectively harnessing their information. Third, our unified framework facilitates a fair comparison and combination of a series of submodels, encompassing several popular MR methods as special cases. Through real data applications, the effectiveness and robustness of $\mathsf{dmIVW}$ in estimating the causal effects of risk factors on common diseases are demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.