Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42704203›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Toward Fit-for-Purpose Data for Drug Assessment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Core Dataset.

Geeske F Grit, Maaike van Dartel, Laura Rodwell, Hanneke van der Woude, Cornelis Boersma, Peter G M Mol, Doranne Hilarius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geeske F GritDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1734-7950
Maaike van DartelDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laura RodwellQ Health Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hanneke van der WoudeDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis BoersmaUnit of Global Health, Department of Health Science, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Peter G M MolDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-3180
Doranne HilariusDepartment of Pharmacy, Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the high unmet medical need in people with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the drug assessment for targeted therapies often rely on small populations and single-arm trials, challenging the evaluation by regulatory authorities, health technology assessment bodies (HTAb), and clinicians. Registry-based real-world data (RWD) can enhance the evaluation and appropriate use of these novel medicines. Therefore, we developed a core dataset that provides a starting point to complement the evaluation of NSCLC drug effects based on registry-based RWD. The core dataset was developed through a literature review of existing core datasets, followed by two multi-stakeholder expert meetings for better understanding of important variables for drug evaluation purposes by different stakeholders. The experts included Dutch clinicians, hospital pharmacists, regulators, HTAb, industry representatives, academics, and a patient representative. Following the literature review, four existing core datasets were identified and used to extract important variables. After two expert meetings, this core dataset was redefined and the final core dataset includes general patient characteristics (n = 6), disease-specific factors (n = 19), treatment details, including systemic therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy (n = 22), outcomes such as death, progression, response (n = 9), and patient-reported outcome measures (n = 17). This core dataset contains relevant variables that provides guidance for the collection of RWD to develop a relevant patient registry for NSCLC and to enhance its fitness-for-purpose. These RWD are intended to address most regulatory, HTA, and healthcare professionals' questions, thereby supporting the generation of real-world evidence for the more appropriate use of NSCLC drugs.

Identifiers

PMID42704203
PMCPMC13548821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.