ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Toward Fit-for-Purpose Data for Drug Assessment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Core Dataset.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward Fit-for-Purpose Data for Drug Assessment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Core Dataset.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considering the high unmet medical need in people with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the drug assessment for targeted therapies often rely on small populations and single-arm trials, challenging the evaluation by regulatory authorities, health technology assessment bodies (HTAb), and clinicians. Registry-based real-world data (RWD) can enhance the evaluation and appropriate use of these novel medicines. Therefore, we developed a core dataset that provides a starting point to complement the evaluation of NSCLC drug effects based on registry-based RWD. The core dataset was developed through a literature review of existing core datasets, followed by two multi-stakeholder expert meetings for better understanding of important variables for drug evaluation purposes by different stakeholders. The experts included Dutch clinicians, hospital pharmacists, regulators, HTAb, industry representatives, academics, and a patient representative. Following the literature review, four existing core datasets were identified and used to extract important variables. After two expert meetings, this core dataset was redefined and the final core dataset includes general patient characteristics (n = 6), disease-specific factors (n = 19), treatment details, including systemic therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy (n = 22), outcomes such as death, progression, response (n = 9), and patient-reported outcome measures (n = 17). This core dataset contains relevant variables that provides guidance for the collection of RWD to develop a relevant patient registry for NSCLC and to enhance its fitness-for-purpose. These RWD are intended to address most regulatory, HTA, and healthcare professionals' questions, thereby supporting the generation of real-world evidence for the more appropriate use of NSCLC drugs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.