ReviewThe Journal of international medical research2026
Elucidating the transformative role of large language models in advancing anesthesiology education.
Review in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review synthesizes evidence published from 2020 to 2026 on the implementation and educational impact of large language models in anesthesiology training, following the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles guidelines. We outline core technical attributes of large language models and identify four validated anesthesiology-specific use cases: standardized learning resource generation, clinical scenario simulation, personalized remediation of knowledge gaps, and automated assessment tool development. Current evidence suggests that these applications improve trainee knowledge scores and reduce faculty workload. Key deployment barriers include the risk of hallucination in high-stakes anesthesia content and potential overreliance on large language models, which may impair independent clinical reasoning. We propose targeted mitigation strategies and a forward-looking research agenda for structured large language model integration. Our analysis confirms that large language models are high-value enabling tools for anesthesiology education and require intentional, guideline-aligned integration to maximize synergies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.