Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42704109›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of international medical research2026

Elucidating the transformative role of large language models in advancing anesthesiology education.

Yu Zhu, Daoqing Xie, Renrui Liang, Jian-Jun Yang, Xueke Du, Cheng-Mao Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu ZhuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, China.
Daoqing XieDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, China.
Renrui LiangDepartment of Nursing, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, China.
Jian-Jun YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The first Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Xueke DuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, China.
Cheng-Mao ZhouDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5680-791X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review synthesizes evidence published from 2020 to 2026 on the implementation and educational impact of large language models in anesthesiology training, following the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles guidelines. We outline core technical attributes of large language models and identify four validated anesthesiology-specific use cases: standardized learning resource generation, clinical scenario simulation, personalized remediation of knowledge gaps, and automated assessment tool development. Current evidence suggests that these applications improve trainee knowledge scores and reduce faculty workload. Key deployment barriers include the risk of hallucination in high-stakes anesthesia content and potential overreliance on large language models, which may impair independent clinical reasoning. We propose targeted mitigation strategies and a forward-looking research agenda for structured large language model integration. Our analysis confirms that large language models are high-value enabling tools for anesthesiology education and require intentional, guideline-aligned integration to maximize synergies.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyLarge Language ModelsHumansanesthesiologyeducationLarge language modelsmedicalpersonalized learningresidency training

Identifiers

PMID42704109
PMCPMC13554528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.