SynthesisPain research & management2026
Explicit Motor Imagery Deficits in Individuals With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explicit Motor Imagery Deficits in Individuals With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pain research & management · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic pain has been associated with disrupted sensorimotor integration and altered internal body representations. While implicit motor imagery (MI) has been explored in pain populations, explicit MI, defined as the deliberate mental simulation of movement, remains less well understood.
objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine differences in explicit MI ability, vividness, and mental chronometry between individuals with chronic pain and healthy controls.
methodsWe screened six databases for observational studies comparing explicit MI outcomes in chronic pain or clinically relevant persistent/recurrent pain-related conditions versus asymptomatic healthy populations. Random-effects and multilevel meta-analyses were conducted using standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence and prediction intervals. Methodological quality was assessed with the JBI and NOS tools.
resultsTwelve studies (n = 1603) met inclusion criteria. Individuals with pain-related clinical conditions showed moderate-to-large deficits in MI ability (SMD = -0.96), vividness (SMD = 1.06 for kinesthetic vividness), and mental chronometry (SMD = 0.84), although heterogeneity varied across outcomes. Mental chronometry showed the most consistent pattern across studies, whereas imagery ability and vividness were associated with greater between-study variability. Correlational analyses identified perceived disability, self-efficacy, and kinesiophobia as relevant moderators. DISCUSSION: Individuals with chronic pain appear to display significant impairments in explicit MI, particularly in temporal simulation and some kinesthetic dimensions. However, these findings should be interpreted in light of the clinical and methodological heterogeneity across included studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.