ArticleThoracic research and practice2026
Respiratory Emergencies in Disasters: A Narrative Review.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disasters cause a wide spectrum of respiratory injuries and affect hundreds of millions of people each year. Because the respiratory system is in continuous contact with the external environment, it is among the most vulnerable systems in disaster settings. Silica-and asbestos-containing dust released from earthquake debris, fine particulate matter from wildfire smoke, mold spores in flood-damaged interiors, ash and acidic gases from volcanic eruptions, toxic industrial chemicals released during chemical incidents, barotrauma from explosions, and biological or pandemic threats each trigger acute and chronic respiratory diseases through distinct mechanisms. This narrative review addresses respiratory emergencies associated with natural and human-made disasters, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic and management approaches, vulnerable populations, and the influence of climate change on the rising burden of disaster-related respiratory disease. Evidence was synthesized from PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, supplemented by official reports from the Emergency Events Database, the World Health Organization, and the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Available data indicate that acute respiratory infections are major causes of morbidity and mortality in disaster settings across all age groups. Furthermore, patients with chronic respiratory diseases face an increased risk of exacerbations, while the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome remains a significant challenge, particularly in resource-limited environments. Disaster preparedness planning must prioritize respiratory emergencies and strengthen response protocols for vulnerable groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.