Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42703988›Full record

ArticleThoracic research and practice2026

Respiratory Emergencies in Disasters: A Narrative Review.

Ali Ekber Karabulut, Burcu Özen Karabulut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali Ekber KarabulutDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Faculty of Medicine, Ağrı, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7203-1178
Burcu Özen KarabulutDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Faculty of Medicine, Ağrı, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-6511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disasters cause a wide spectrum of respiratory injuries and affect hundreds of millions of people each year. Because the respiratory system is in continuous contact with the external environment, it is among the most vulnerable systems in disaster settings. Silica-and asbestos-containing dust released from earthquake debris, fine particulate matter from wildfire smoke, mold spores in flood-damaged interiors, ash and acidic gases from volcanic eruptions, toxic industrial chemicals released during chemical incidents, barotrauma from explosions, and biological or pandemic threats each trigger acute and chronic respiratory diseases through distinct mechanisms. This narrative review addresses respiratory emergencies associated with natural and human-made disasters, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic and management approaches, vulnerable populations, and the influence of climate change on the rising burden of disaster-related respiratory disease. Evidence was synthesized from PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, supplemented by official reports from the Emergency Events Database, the World Health Organization, and the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Available data indicate that acute respiratory infections are major causes of morbidity and mortality in disaster settings across all age groups. Furthermore, patients with chronic respiratory diseases face an increased risk of exacerbations, while the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome remains a significant challenge, particularly in resource-limited environments. Disaster preparedness planning must prioritize respiratory emergencies and strengthen response protocols for vulnerable groups.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromeclimate changeDisastersearthquakespandemicswildfires

Identifiers

PMID42703988
PMCPMC13548738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.