Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42703722›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2026

Assessment of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm response to amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin using a dynamic in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of catheter-associated urinary tract infection.

Desiye Tesfaye Tegegne, Paweł Jajor, Jacek Bania, Paweł Migdał, Robert Dziedzic, Błażej Poźniak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Desiye Tesfaye TegegneDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Norwida 31, Wrocław 50-375, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-6743
Paweł JajorDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Norwida 31, Wrocław 50-375, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3661-7486
Jacek BaniaDepartment of Food Hygiene and Consumer Health Protection, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Norwida 31, Wrocław 50-375, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9544-7846
Paweł MigdałInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Breeding, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Chełmońskiego 38E, Wrocław 51-630, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2615-9760
Robert DziedzicDepartment of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, ul. Łukasiewicza 5, Wrocław 50-371, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3443-4136
Błażej PoźniakDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Norwida 31, Wrocław 50-375, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5813-1404

Funding

Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences N070/0011/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are among the most common types of healthcare-associated infections. Among uropathogens, Enterococcus faecalis is particularly notable for its strong capacity to form biofilms on urinary catheters, thereby decreasing its susceptibility to antibiotics commonly used to treat CAUTIs. However, current antibiotic dosing strategies still rely on planktonic phenotypes, limiting their applicability to biofilm-associated infections. To address this limitation, a dynamic in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was developed to assess E. faecalis biofilms' response to different treatment regimens.

methodsBiofilms of model E. faecalis strains (ATCC 29212 and 54) were preformed on urinary catheters. Mature biofilms were subjected to simulated urinary dosing regimens of amoxicillin (500 mg q12h for 3 days) or ciprofloxacin (500 mg q24h for 3 days), as well as to constant antibiotic concentrations for 3 days. Viable bacterial counts and biofilm biomass were then measured at predefined timepoints, and the effects of the simulated dosing regimens were compared to those observed under constant antibiotic exposure.

resultsOur findings indicate that daily ciprofloxacin demonstrated the greatest antibacterial activity, significantly surpassing the effects of constant ciprofloxacin exposure, twice-daily dosing of amoxicillin, and constant amoxicillin exposure. Although the simulated amoxicillin regimen was more effective than constant amoxicillin exposure, both achieved only moderate reductions. Notably, constant amoxicillin exposure induced biofilm formation. Ciprofloxacin exhibited markedly greater antibiofilm activity than amoxicillin against both E. faecalis strains. Among the evaluated regimens, CIP 500 mg q24h produced the most pronounced reduction in biofilm bacterial burden, achieving decreases exceeding 3 log10 cfu/cm2 in both strains after 72 h of exposure.

conclusionsThe findings show that antibiotic efficacy against E. faecalis biofilms depends on the antibiotic and its dosing regimen, with fluctuating ciprofloxacin exposure producing the strongest bactericidal effect and biofilm reduction.

Indexed as

AmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCatheter-Related InfectionsCiprofloxacinEnterococcus faecalisUrinary Tract InfectionsBacterial LoadHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID42703722
PMCPMC13547859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.